Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
sl014940 inaTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0001234800000 NNC4940V Auendurchmesser: 280 mm Bezugsdrehzahl: 820 1 min ueres Breitenma: 80 mm Gewicht: 15142 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 1. 310 1 min Herstellungsland: Deutschland Innendurchmesser: 200 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 280,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "1310. 0000" ueres Breitenmae:(B) mm 80,00 ueres Breitenmae:(b) mm 80,00 ECLASS number 23 05 09 01
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0001234800000 NNC4940V |
| Außendurchmesser: 280 mm |
| Bezugsdrehzahl: 820 1/min |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 80 mm |
| Gewicht: 15142 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 1.310 1/min |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Innendurchmesser: 200 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 280,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "1310.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 80,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(b) mm 80,00 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 15.5 |
| Innenmaße: mm 200,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 680000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 1440000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "820.0000" |
| B 80 mm Äußeres Breitenmaße: |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 120 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 1.440.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 680.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 176.000 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 1 min 252,3 mm Minimaler Borddurchmesser des Aussenringes |
| D 280 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 680.000 N |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 176.000 N |
| Kurzzeichen DIN5412: NNC4940V |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 2,1 mm |
| Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 230,5 mm |
| Minimaler Borddurchmesser des Aussenringes: 252,3 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 2,1 mm |
| Minimaler Wellenabsatz: 230,5 mm |
| NNC4940V Kurzzeichen DIN5412 |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 1.440.000 N |
| T max 120 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| d =a min 230,5 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =c min 230,5 mm Minimaler Wellenabsatz |
| n G 1.310 1/min Grenzdrehzahl |
| n ϑr 820 1/min Bezugsdrehzahl |
| r a max 2,1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 2,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 15,131 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 2495 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Interesting Concept, But Redundant If You Already Use BHA
If you have seen this Glow Rice Exfoliant Ampoule Duo on Instagram or TikTok, you already know the marketing pitch: a gentle, soft peel that physically cleans out pores on your face and body. After testing it, I can confirm that it actually does clean pores, but the mechanism is nothing magical. It relies on the friction of massaging the serum into your skin to clump up and manually extract dead skin and debris. It is a satisfying and interesting process to watch, but it isn't groundbreaking.The biggest drawback is its redundancy if you already have a solid skincare routine. I noticed that when I use this product after my usual BHA (Beta Hydroxy Acid) exfoliant, it becomes completely ineffective. Because the chemical exfoliant already cleans deep inside the pores and dissolves dead skin cells, this manual friction gel finds nothing left to grab onto. It is a decent, gentle physical exfoliant that does the job, but if you already use a chemical exfoliant like BHA, you can safely skip this social media trend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great Product!
This duo was Exactly what my facial routine has been missing!
I Absolutely love it! My acne has never been better and it has left my skin so soft and healthy both looking and feeling!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Skin feels so soft!
I actually love this stuff it makes my skin feel so smooth and soft after I use it! I don’t see a difference between the two they both work equally imo. Great if you’re in a budget and was great exfoliation!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Not as good as the real thing
I was really hoping to get a less expensive alternative to Dr Melaxin’s version. This just isn’t cutting it - it totally is not as effective, so I’m tossing this and going back. This one just doesn’t pill up as effectively.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Not as effective as original Dr. M
I bought this after reading several reviews that it is as effective as the original Dr. M. Having used both I can assert this product is NOT nearly as effective. I still had some of the original Dr. M. and did a half and half comparison and it was immediately clear. This exfoliate "pills" like the original but not nearly to the degree and when washed away the half I used the leftover Dr. M. was clean of dead skin and showed clear pores. The other half? Not so much. I'll be going back to the original.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2026